| |
If a large percentage
of students are below the standard on the VT-PASS Science Assessment,
you might want to consider the following actions:
-
Determine if these
results are consistent with classroom and school science assessment
data and teacher perceptions.
-
Develop an articulated
K-12 science curriculum if none exists.
-
Seek curriculum expertise
in science or help in developing one.
-
Look for developmentally
appropriate standards-based science resources (i.e. textbooks,
standards-based units, supporting materials, supplies, library
and technology resources, community sources).
-
Ask if the resources
support inquiry in science.
-
Make sure every teacher
K-6 teaches science.
-
Make sure every student
K-12 has the opportunity to take science courses that address
the full range of standards.
-
Make sure every teacher
K-12 has the content expertise to deliver the standards.
-
Make sure every teacher
integrates the Learning Opportunities ("best practice" pedagogy)
into classroom instruction.
-
Make sure standards-based
assessments are used in every classroom for frequent student
feedback and for making instructional decisions along the way.
-
Allocate professional
development resources to support improved science knowledge
and pedagogy.
-
Consider the full
range of professional development models from large informational
conferences to on-site demonstration of content and pedagogy
and make sure all teachers have access to the professional
development in science.
If your results show
a large percentage of students in the "achieved the standard" and "honors'
categories, but there are still students in the "below" or "little
evidence" categories, you may want to consider:
-
Disaggregating your
data to see who the students in the below the standard categories
are. (Are they female, minority, LEP, lower SFS, etc.?)
-
Check course taking
patterns to see if ALL students have the opportunity to access
the full range of standards K-12 What courses have they taken?
What opportunities have those courses offered?
-
Collect any other
data that will help determine what is in the way of their achievement?
How do they differ from the groups nearly, meeting, and achieving
honors?
If your results show
an average percentage of students in the "achieved the standard" and "honors" categories,
but more than half are only nearly or below meeting the standard,
you may want to consider asking:
-
Is our science program
of a high quality, offering access of the full range of the
standards to all students?
-
Are ALL teachers
equipped with the content and the pedagogy to not just "cover" the
standards, but to enable students to master them?
-
Who are the students
in the "nearly" category? What courses have they taken? Have
they had the same curriculum and opportunities as those meeting
the standard?
-
How do our results
compare to other schools like us? If their results are different,
how does their science program differ from ours?
|